Xref: utzoo rec.video:21299 sci.electronics:20679 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!exodus!oobleck.Eng.Sun.COM!bender From: bender@oobleck.Eng.Sun.COM (memory fault - core dumped) Newsgroups: rec.video,sci.electronics Subject: Re: RGBS -> Y/C Message-ID: <14623@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> Date: 6 Jun 91 03:28:43 GMT References: <13965@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <1862@vidiot.UUCP> <2829@otc.otca.oz> Sender: news@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM Followup-To: rec.video Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mt. View, Ca. Lines: 30 In article <2829@otc.otca.oz> siri@otc.research.otca.oz.au (Siri Hewa) writes: ->>|In article <13965@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> anantha@zabriskie.berkeley.edu (Anantha Chandrakasan) writes: ->>< ->>>>> ->>WARNING: Unless the RGB signal is NTSC compatible with regards to the frame ->>rates, you will not be able to record the output. All other RBG frame rates ->>MUST be sent through a RGB to NTSC converter. The only RGB that was even ->>close to NTSC was the IBM CGA standard. All analog RGB rates that I know of ->>are not NTSC compatible. -> ->Iam sorry to say, this person don't have any theoratical or practical knowledge ->of the video signal. You can't say that All analogue RGB rates are not NTSC ->compatible, Analogue RGB in video world, ie Broadcast and Domestic is One volt ->p-p, NTSC, is 60 Hz, and 525 lines. Pal is 50 Hz, and 625 lines. And no more ->crap. I think what Vidiot was trying to say is that he knows of no COMPUTER analog (analogue :-) signals that are at the NTSC frame rates other than the signals he mentioned. mike p.s. shouldn't that be "craoup" instead of "crap"? -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1985 Honda Shadow VT1100 | DOD #000007 1989 Honda NX-650 | AMA #511250