Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!dimacs.rutgers.edu!aramis.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!christian From: jclark@sdcc6.ucsd.edu (John Clark) Newsgroups: soc.religion.christian Subject: Re: SDA doctrine - Sabbaths & Investigative Judgement Message-ID: Date: 7 Jun 91 03:13:24 GMT Sender: hedrick@athos.rutgers.edu Organization: University of California, San Diego Lines: 14 Approved: christian@aramis.rutgers.edu In article James.Quilty@comp.vuw.ac.nz (James William Quilty) writes: + It does make sense when one ACTUALLY reads the Bible ! The verses where Paul +is said to go to the Synagogue "as was his custom" should be put in context +with the next verse after - which say that he witnessed Jesus to the Jews he +found there ! That makes MUCH more sense than your assertion :-) Paul appearently was a 'opportunist' in these matters, he used the 'unknown god' to introduce his preaching to some group. Should Christians refer to their Diety as the "Unknown God" forever. Or should they realize that it was an opportune moment. -- John Clark jclark@ucsd.edu