Xref: utzoo alt.folklore.computers:12759 comp.arch:23216 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!hoptoad!amdcad!sono!miklg From: miklg@sono.uucp (Michael Goldman ) Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.arch Subject: Re: XDS940 computer (or Xerox Sigma 9) Message-ID: <1991Jun12.180535.19518@sono.uucp> Date: 12 Jun 91 18:05:35 GMT References: <1991Jun5.231450.25856@digi.lonestar.org> <13933@goofy.Apple.COM> Organization: Acuson; Mountain View, California Lines: 33 I worked for Comshare in the 78-79 and they were still using Xerox Sigma 9s They had a friendly timesharing OS with one of the earliest relational databases. Even then, they had a hard time getting parts. They had a dedi- cated group of engineers scrounging the world for spare parts. They would get enough of them and build a new machine. Their OS could handle multi-CPUs but Amdahl's law prevailed and they never used more than 3 or four together. They were actually going to make a new OS for it when they changed their mind and bought an IBM timesharing co. (I mean the co. used IBM mainframes). Then I went to work for MDSI (also in Ann Arbor) which had a very lucrative machine tool language they ran timesharing for customers on 940s (the founders had spun off from Comshare). They had optimized the hell out of that assembly language program. They rented time on 940s from Tymshare in Sunnyvale, Comshare in Ann Arbor, and a French company in central France. The little things supported an unusually large number of customers for such an antique machine. They had some DEC-10s they ran for development. They had changed the microcode on the DEC-10s so it would run 940 assembly code !! (Top THAT you hackers !). They had evaluated switching their timesharing customers to similarly altered DEC-10s but they mis-read the data I gave them on performance and wrongly concluded that it wsn't cost-effective. The point became moot when the '81-82 recession wiped out the machine tool industry in the US, and MDSI came out with an upgrade with mind-boggling productivity improvements for the machine tool industry which ran on a VAX (Pascal this time - they'd learned their lesson.) Then I moved to California. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Michael Goldman. "Never test for an error condition you don't know how to handle." ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++