Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!Firewall!uunet!mcsun!ukc!slxsys!ibmpcug!mantis!mathew From: mathew@mantis.co.uk (Giving C News a *HUG*) Newsgroups: comp.human-factors Subject: Re: What's this?? Message-ID: <76BJ413w164w@mantis.co.uk> Date: 14 Jun 91 14:16:29 GMT References: Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK. Lines: 62 In article <33519@usc.edu>, czinngra@skat.usc.edu (Claude Zinngrabe) writes: > This newsgroup only recently appeared at my site; apparently it has > just recently been formed. Could someone please explain to me the > purpose/intent of this newsgroup?? Here's the charter from the original call for votes I posted: === STATUS OF NEWSGROUP: unmoderated PURPOSE/CHARTER: To provide a forum for discussion of general issues relating to human-computer interaction (HCI) and human factors. HCI issues are currently discussed in a number of newsgroups, and are relevant to discussions in: alt.hypertext comp.infosystems alt.toolkits.xview comp.multimedia comp.cog-eng comp.software-eng comp.graphics comp.windows.* comp.groupware HCI is an extremely broad topic. Examples of possible subjects for discussion include: * Design of keyboards, mice, joysticks. * Choice of command names and parameter syntax, and the effect on the number of mistakes users make. * Design of effective symbols for communicating information. * Control relations for scroll bars, switches and so on. * Use of Agents for representing semi-autonomous processes. * Use of colour in user interface design. * Methods for prototyping user interfaces. * How to evaluate the effectiveness of a user interface. * Designing effective dialogues for interactive programs. * Possible new forms of feedback -- sound, smell, touch. * Customizability vs. stability. At present, such discussions are scattered amongst the existing comp.* groups. WHAT THE NEWSGROUP IS *NOT*: The newsgroup is NOT intended for discussion of topics specific to particular window systems and not illustrating any general point; such discussion should take place in the existing comp.windows groups. Nor is it intended as a place where people can preach the virtues of their favourite windowing system. The newsgroup is also not intended for human-factors discussion which is not relevant to the field of computing. === mathew