Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!spool.mu.edu!agate!linus!linus!thelonius!marsh From: marsh@thelonius.mitre.org (Ralph Marshall 617 271-8784) Newsgroups: comp.human-factors Subject: Re: Eye Movement Tracker Message-ID: <1991Jun14.192945.16681@linus.mitre.org> Date: 14 Jun 91 19:29:45 GMT Article-I.D.: linus.1991Jun14.192945.16681 References: <164661@felix.UUCP> Sender: news@linus.mitre.org (News Service) Distribution: na Organization: The MITRE Corporation, Bedford, MA 01730 Lines: 38 Nntp-Posting-Host: thelonius.mitre.org In article <164661@felix.UUCP> asylvain@felix.UUCP (Alvin "the Chipmunk" Sylvain) writes: >How about tossing that old mouse into the trash can, and construct a >device which looks into your eyes while you're reading the screen, and >can actually track the precise location of what you're looking at? > >Rather than "clicking" a mouse, you just touch a button when you want to >select the word or screen-button that's in your current "gaze." Natur- >ally, a cursor follows your gaze around the screen, and touching the >button flashes the cursor (or inverts the screen button, whatever) for >immediate feedback. > >Such devices already exist, but they require physical contact with the >eyeball. This is undesireable (at least to me!) The problem is only partly with the fact that existing devices for tracking your eyes are cumbersome and unpleasant to use. There are reasonable systems that track your eyes visually using cameras and simple image recognition, but they still require that you keep your head in a 1' cubic area. The bigger problem is that you don't really look at things the way you think you do. First of all, blinking can be a problem, but bigger problems come from the fact that your eye doesn't stay fixed on any one place. It moves about very rapidly, and only generally stays in the area that you think you're looking directly at. It also jumps when you move to look at another area, and takes a fairly long period of time to settle down at the new position. So, you can't just replace the current pointing device with an eye tracker, even if it could track your eye perfectly. You need a new model of how to determine the "selected area" based on the raw eye position values, and this work needs more research into how people really see things. -- Ralph Marshall (marsh@linus.mitre.org) Disclaimer: Often wrong but never in doubt... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------