Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!lth.se!newsuser
From: dag@control.lth.se (Dag Bruck)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: solution to implementing parameterized classes
Message-ID: <1991Jun11.141810.26619@lth.se>
Date: 11 Jun 91 14:18:10 GMT
References: <2792@umriscc.isc.umr.edu> <1991Jun9.013306.4462@cs.sfu.ca> <1991Jun9.204515.18040@ms.uky.edu> <25349@well.sf.ca.us>
Sender: newsuser@lth.se (LTH network news server)
Organization: Department of Automatic Control, Lund, Sweden
Lines: 11

In article <25349@well.sf.ca.us> nagle@well.sf.ca.us (John Nagle) writes:
>
>     The notion that the solution to providing generics in C++ involves a
>template preprocessor feeding a C++ preprocessor feeding a C preprocessor
>feeding a C compiler leads me to suspect that something is very wrong.

To me it suggests that people have successfully managed to build on
existing tools.  Maybe I would understand your point if you elaborated.


		-- Dag Bruck