Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ncar!ico!auto-trol!mattel
From: mattel@auto-trol.com (Matt Telles)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: solution to implementing parameterized classes
Message-ID: <1991Jun11.183133.11458@auto-trol.com>
Date: 11 Jun 91 18:31:33 GMT
References: <1991Jun9.013306.4462@cs.sfu.ca> <1991Jun9.204515.18040@ms.uky.edu> <25349@well.sf.ca.us>
Sender: news@auto-trol.com
Organization: Auto-trol
Lines: 19
Nntp-Posting-Host: mattel

In article <25349@well.sf.ca.us> nagle@well.sf.ca.us (John Nagle) writes:
>
>     As does the notion that "(void *)" should be a normal part of programming.
>
>					John Nagle
>
>     
   FINALLY!  Someone else that dislikes the idea of a pointer to nothing ...

Can't we define a type called generic????  (You know, like a generic pointer).

Matt


-- 
==============================================================================
Matt Telles 	                 mattel@auto-trol.COM
                                 {...}ncar!ico!auto-trol!mattel
Auto-trol Technology 12500 N Washington Denver, CO 80241-2404 (303)252-2874