Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!pitt!willett!ForthNet
From: ForthNet@willett.pgh.pa.us (ForthNet articles from GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Multi-tasking and Multi-user
Message-ID: <2875.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 14 Jun 91 01:26:01 GMT
Organization: (n.) to be organized.  But that's not important right now.
Lines: 22


 Date: 06-11-91 (08:23)              Number: 137 of 138 (Echo)
   To: ELLIOTT.C                     Refer#: 129
 From: JACK WOEHR                      Read: NO
 Subj: MULTI-TASKING AND MULTI-U     Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE
 Conf: FORTH (58)                 Read Type: GENERAL (+)

 -> JAX, I just saw your Dr. Dobbs article.  What about queuing instead
 -> of roundrobin in the context of something like your "medium-
 -> heavyweight" multitasker?

         That's an interesting idea ... do you have an example in mind?

                 =jax=

 NET/Mail : RCFB Golden, CO (303) 278-0364 VESTA & Denver FIG for Forth!
 <<<>>>
-----
This message came from GEnie via willett.  You *cannot* reply to the author
using e-mail.  Please post a follow-up article, or use any instructions
the author may have included (USMail addresses, telephone #, etc.).
Report problems to: dwp@willett.pgh.pa.us _or_ uunet!willett!dwp