Xref: utzoo alt.drugs:12309 comp.org.eff.talk:2576
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!mauler
From: mauler@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: alt.drugs,comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: Growing MJ (Advice sought)
Message-ID: <1991Jun11.130253.31356@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>
Date: 11 Jun 91 13:02:53 CDT
References: <20369@cs.utexas.edu> <16801@helios.TAMU.EDU> <1991Jun4.184604.27133@rodan.acs.syr.edu> <1991Jun05.183440.29680@ddsw1.MCS.COM>
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services
Lines: 22

In article <1991Jun05.183440.29680@ddsw1.MCS.COM>, zane@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Sameer Parekh) writes:
> In article <1991Jun4.184604.27133@rodan.acs.syr.edu> dbarberi@rodan.acs.syr.edu (I will *not* justify my actions) writes:
>>
>>   So what IS the difference between printed media and electronic media? 
>>
> 	Idiot juries, judges, and lawyers understand print media, and they
> do not understand electronic media.
> 

Since they do not understand it, they treat it as the worst possible case for
either printed text or speech (i.e., whatever you're being charged with using
the electronic media as evidence just got ten times worse).

Either that, or they throw it out of court since it can be easily changed. 
Throwing it out usually only occurs when it is evidence in your favor...

> -- 
> The Ravings of the Insane Maniac Sameer Parekh -- zane@ddsw1.MCS.COM
> 
>