Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!crdgw1!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!o.gp.cs.cmu.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!ralf
From: Ralf.Brown@B.GP.CS.CMU.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Re: MSDOS 5.0 Bugs
Message-ID: <28576b6b@ralf>
Date: 13 Jun 91 12:56:11 GMT
Organization: Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science
Lines: 17
In-Reply-To: <1991Jun12.221035.23543@netcom.COM>
Originator: ralf@B.GP.CS.CMU.EDU

In article <1991Jun12.221035.23543@netcom.COM>, feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) wrote:
}Having seen the dos 5 shell program, I think I like the Mi Shell
}better (of course Mi costs extra, but I already had it...).

Am I the only one that is appalled by the color schemes the DOS 5 shell
sticks you with?  I can't stand a bright white background, and the only
three color selections which don't have one are all monochrome (two of
which have a gray background and the third is dim gray on black--yech).
Considering its size, it is lacking in features as well (the PC Tools
shell totals about 50% more program bytes, but has at least five times
as many features).  On the other hand, the DOS "shell" I use by far the
most is 4DOS....
-- 
{backbone}!cs.cmu.edu!ralf  ARPA: RALF@CS.CMU.EDU   FIDO: Ralf Brown 1:129/53
BITnet: RALF%CS.CMU.EDU@CARNEGIE   AT&Tnet: (412)268-3053 (school)   FAX: ask
DISCLAIMER?  Did  | It isn't what we don't know that gives us trouble, it's
I claim something?| what we know that ain't so.  --Will Rogers