Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!sics.se!fuug!mcsun!ukc!stl!dswt From: dswt@stl.stc.co.uk (Stewart Tansley) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.appletalk Subject: Split-addressing with Fastpaths & atalkad Summary: Any previous experience out there? Keywords: Split addressing mode, Fastpaths, atalkad, Bad news Message-ID: <4545@stl.stc.co.uk> Date: 12 Jun 91 12:35:33 GMT Sender: news@stl.stc.co.uk Reply-To: "Stewart Tansley" Organization: BNR Europe Limited, London Road, Harlow, Essex, UK Lines: 47 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Anyone else out there ever tried to used split addressing mode on their Fastpaths (option 9 in K-STAR v8)? We're trying to reconfigure from a simpler existing setup using one subnet. Any experience/help would be appreciated... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ We have a simple setup: 3 Fastpath 4s handling 3 appletalk zones, bridging to a backbone ethernet. Fastpath configuration is (or would be!) done using an atalkad daemon running on a central Sun. Originally everything went along swimmingly with the Fastpaths & their associated Mac virtual IP addreses in the same subnet. Now though, we have to split this subnet into 3 new separate subnets, and place the Fastpaths on the main net, using the 'split addressing' mode. On setting things up in the new configuration, we can get one Fastpath to run apparently fine (although associated CAP v5 hosts don't seem to be able to do NBP stuff correctly -- getzones & atlook fails), but on connecting up a second fastpath, we had a massive broadcast storm from the latter, resulting in mega net problems. Temporarily we have gone over to local configuration of the other 2 Fastpaths, and they seem to 'mostly' work in split addressing mode; the single daemon-controlled Fastpath remains stable. CAP seems to provide AUFS and LWSRV services ok, but atlook and getzones fail. We need to move to a position that allows daemon-control of these two other Fastpaths. Questions: - Has anyone got a copy of their atalkatab and atalk.local files that they could send me, where you are using a similar split-addressing setup? - Any problems I should know about in this setup -- eg. why would we get such a broadcast storm? Does split addressing *work* using atalkad? - To experiment, I may wish to setup a second atalkad -- can I run this while the existing one is running (it's control is out of my hands), but running different atalkatab files? - Why me? :-) Thanks for any assistance! :-) =========================================================================== Stewart Tansley | BNR Europe Limited (was STL...) | 'Be cool, or be | London Rd, Harlow, CM17 9NA, UK | cast out...' dswt@stl.stc.co.uk | +44 279 429531 x2763 | Subdivisions, Rush =========================================================================== 'You know how that rabbit feels -- going under your speeding wheels...' ===========================================================================