Xref: utzoo comp.windows.ms:13714 comp.protocols.nfs:2443
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!sun!amdcad!brahms!phil
From: phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.protocols.nfs
Subject: Re: PC-NFS Advanced Telnet query
Message-ID: <1991Jun11.184925.10443@amd.com>
Date: 11 Jun 91 18:49:25 GMT
References: <83286@bu.edu> <1991Jun7.041702.1883@amd.com> <605@academ.academ.com>
Sender: usenet@amd.com (NNTP Posting)
Distribution: na
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Lines: 20

sob@academ.COM (Stan Barber) writes:
>In article <1991Jun7.041702.1883@amd.com> phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai) writes:
>>The pictures I saw of Advanced Telnet looked like "windowed" DOS
>>sessions in 386 enhanced mode. That is, there was no resize ability,
>>etc. So it wouldn't be exactly like "terminal". However, it would
>>probably meet your needs, if you have a 386 and enough memory to run in
>>enhanced mode.

>The Advanced Telnet is just like Reflection. I am no windoes wiz, but
>it appeared to run just like WQVTnet did. Maybe that's not running "in
>windows", but it sure looked like it was running in Windows. You could
>resize it, make it full screen and so on.

According to a very reliable source who has personally used A.T. and
knows PCs and Windows, sob's comments are not accurate. WinQVTnet is
a real windows application, A.T. is a DOS application, with a PIF file,
that runs in a DOS session.

--
The only satisfaction you can get from a cheap tool is throwing it away.