Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!lll-winken!Firewall!uunet!kgw2!kgw1!dennisg
From: dennisg@kgw1.xetron.COM (Dennis Glatting)
Newsgroups: comp.realtime
Subject: Re: C/lint/Ada  (was: Re: RSX -- one of the best?)
Message-ID: <2188@kgw2.XETRON.COM>
Date: 14 Jun 91 16:43:37 GMT
References: <1991Jun8.020558.3562@telesoft.com>
Sender: root@kgw2.XETRON.COM
Reply-To: dennisg@Xetron.COM
Distribution: comp.realtime
Organization: Xetron Corporation, Cincinnati Ohio
Lines: 22
Nntp-Posting-Host: kgw1

In article <1991Jun8.020558.3562@telesoft.com>, rlk@telesoft.com (Bob Kitzberger @sation) writes:
|> 
|> Greg Franks writes:
|> > Someone else writes:
|> >   >better.  (I like Concurrent Euclid myself -- real time programming
|> >   >made easy!  Who knows, I might even like Ada.)
|> >   >
|> >   I didn't think anybody liked ADA :)
|> >
|> >I'm not particularly crazy about it either actually.   
|> >I guess the US DOD likes it though.  
|> 
|> Sorry for a bit of zealotry, but I keep hearing unwarranted damnation of
|> Ada due to its DoD ties.  Why?  The design was contracted out to several 
|> teams, not designed internally to DoD.
|> 
personally, i prefer a object oriented language rather than object based.
when ada gets inheritence and a PD compiler then i'll take it seriously.

-- 
 ..!uunet!kgw2!dennisg  | Dennis P. Glatting
 dennisg@Xetron.COM     | so?