Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!gblock
From: gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Gregory R Block)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: (Video) Hardware Idiots ?
Message-ID: <12978@uwm.edu>
Date: 11 Jun 91 04:46:43 GMT
References: <1991Jun10.091140.15163@ncsu.edu>
Sender: news@uwm.edu
Reply-To: gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
Lines: 24
Originator: gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

From article <1991Jun10.091140.15163@ncsu.edu>, by kdarling@hobbes.catt.ncsu.edu (Kevin Darling):
> However, for my view, I'm thinking of those who'd like to see true DIG
> available even for such cards as HAM-E, DCTV, FC24, CB, ULowell, etc...
> which have radically different data interface methods.

Couldn't DCTV, Ham-E, and ColorBurst systems be used directly by 2.0
with one of their graphics thingies?  Under the preferences, they have
the thing with the mdoes supported...  and stuff.  I don't have 2.0,
which I imagine is quite obvious...  and my dealer got tired of me
sitting at his only 3000 on display messing around with his 2.0 setup.
:)

Because it supports the copper, blitter, and everything else that's
ALREADY there, couldn't it just be done easily with 2.0?  No DIG necessary?

ULowell, I imagine, may be similar, but I can forsee a few problems...
Not many, but a few...

Greg

-- 
All opinions are my own, and not those of my employer.
Why?  He doesn't know I'm doing this.
								-Wubba