Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ccwf.cc.utexas.edu From: awessels@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Allen Wessels) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: Playground for Futility Message-ID: <50320@ut-emx.uucp> Date: 11 Jun 91 14:46:10 GMT References: Sender: news@ut-emx.uucp Reply-To: awessels@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Allen Wessels) Organization: The University of Texas at Austin Lines: 13 In article undrground!tak@amix.commodore.com (Kevin Takacs) writes: > Perhaps this group should be renamed "comp.sys.amiga.insecurity," >or if you prefer (I'm not taking sides) "comp.sys.mac.insecurity." Why >waste band with such exercises in futility? Does anyone actually think >they can convince the other side that they're wrong? Who will admit to >spending a few thousand dollars on the "wrong" computer system. You all In many cases it isn't a matter of convincing people which is the better machine. There is quite a bit of misunderstanding on the part of some of the participants of both sides of the conversation. Anyone who takes the time to look for the facts behind the flames will pick out lots of good information.