Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!pacbell.com!tandem!zorch!mike
From: mike@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Mike Smithwick)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: We know NeXT owners and Mac owners read...what about?
Message-ID: <1991Jun12.180552.12818@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG>
Date: 12 Jun 91 18:05:52 GMT
References: <1061.28534e6f@vger.nsu.edu> <1991Jun11.024649.25130@nntp-server.caltech.edu> <1067.2854a56b@vger.nsu.edu>
Organization: SF-Bay Public-Access Unix
Lines: 27

In article <1991Jun11.024649.25130@nntp-server.caltech.edu>, rknop@nntp-server.caltech.edu (Robert Andrew Knop) writes:
> manes@vger.nsu.edu ((Mark D. Manes), Norfolk State University) writes:
> 
>>I am curious what else is there?  As Captain Picard says "Lets see what's
>>out there.. " and so here goes.
> 
> [List of irrelevant computers deleted...]
> 
>>Now, would the owners of each of these systems please step up and 
>>draw your sword.  It's time to defend your choice!
> 
> I, for one, am personally offended that you didn't mention the Commodore
> 64, or at the very least the cover of it's manual.
>

You also forgot to list the DigiComp 1. Now that was a fine little 3-bit 
computer for its time. I did get tired of having to replace those tiny
rubber bands though. At least the Amiga doesn't use rubber bands.

mike



-- 
"There is no problem too big that can't be solved with high explosives"-Rush

Mike Smithwick - ames!zorch!mike