Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!crackers!cpoint!frog!rmkhome!rmk
From: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: The Amigas Future
Message-ID: <9106121045.14@rmkhome.UUCP>
Date: 12 Jun 91 19:45:00 GMT
References: <5068@orbit.cts.com> <16647@darkstar.ucsc.edu> <1308@cbmger.UUCP> <28@ryptyde.UUCP>
Reply-To: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly)
Organization: The Man With Ten Cats
Lines: 17

In article <28@ryptyde.UUCP> dant@ryptyde.UUCP (Daniel Tracy) writes:
>Responding to the following:
>
>">>not enough power eh?  you call 50 Mhz not enough power?  show me a Mac with 50
>>** [What C= computer runs at 50 Mhz? ] **
> 
>It's a quite normal policy to let some of upgrade and add-on features up
>to the 3rd parties. This device *IS* available, it exists, so it may be
>used as a pro argument for the Amiga."
>
>Yes, but what's the argument? There are 50MHz 68030's AND 68040's for the Mac,
>so what's the point? Is there a 50MHz 68040 available for the Amiga?


Right now, you probably couldn't get a 50MHz 68040 chip, to save your life.

Rick Kelly	rmk@rmkhome.UUCP	frog!rmkhome!rmk	rmk@frog.UUCP