Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixb.cc.columbia.edu!es1
From: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita)
Subject: Re: CDTV News
Message-ID: <1991Jun15.172531.26738@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
Sender: usenet@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Network News)
Nntp-Posting-Host: cunixb.cc.columbia.edu
Reply-To: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita)
Organization: Columbia University
References: <1991Jun14.125339.18489@NCoast.ORG> <1991Jun14.214105.1414@ncsu.edu> <1991Jun15.120756.17928@news.iastate.edu>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 1991 17:25:31 GMT

In article <1991Jun15.120756.17928@news.iastate.edu> taab5@isuvax.iastate.edu writes:
>
>   That clinches it, then.  Both the CD-I and CDTV will support the
>ability to display Photo CD images.  The CD-I systems will display
>the images at a higher resolution and far better color capability 
>than the CDTV, with standard hardware.  The CDTV will not even come
>close to the capabilities of CD-I in the area of displaying still
>pictures, and will require extra hardware to display the pictures
>effectively.  
>
	True, but so what? Kodak Photo CDs are hardly the biggest
selling point of either of these machines.
	-- Ethan

Now the world has gone to bed,		Now I lay me down to sleep,
Darkness won't engulf my head,		Try to count electric sheep,
I can see by infrared,			Sweet dream wishes you can keep,
How I hate the night.			How I hate the night.   -- Marvin