Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!gatech!mcnc!uvaarpa!vger.nsu.edu!manes
From: manes@vger.nsu.edu ((Mark D. Manes), Norfolk State University)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re:  Information on Amiga Technical Reference Seri
Message-ID: <1075.2858ce37@vger.nsu.edu>
Date: 14 Jun 91 18:09:59 GMT
References: <3036@public.BTR.COM> <22380@cbmvax.commodore.com> <7893@tekgen.BV.TEK.COM>
Lines: 28

In article <7893@tekgen.BV.TEK.COM>, boblu@tekgen.BV.TEK.COM (Robert Luneski) writes:
>>-- 
>>andy finkel		{uunet|rutgers|amiga}!cbmvax!andy
>>Commodore-Amiga, Inc.
>>
>> "2.0 is not the answer.  2.0 is the question.  Yes is the answer."
>>
> 
> Wrong, "When, is the question"  In our lifetime?  It is now in excess of
> a year since the introduction of the 3000 and there is still no romable
> code and no sign whatsoever of WB2.0 on A500/A2000.  So when WILL we 
> actually see God's gift to operating systems?
> 

It runs fine on my A2000... I guess you will have it when 'it's ready'.

I hate messages like yours.

> Bob Luneski

 -mark=
     
 +--------+   ==================================================          
 | \/     |   Mark D. Manes   "The Most lopsided deal since ..."
 | /\  \/ |   manes@vger.nsu.edu                                        
 |     /  |   (804) 683-2532    "Make up your own mind! - AMIGA"
 +--------+   ==================================================
 "I protest Captain!  I am not a merry man!" - Lt. Worf