Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!boulder!horton.Colorado.EDU!chuj
From: chuj@horton.colorado.edu (CHU JEFFREY)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Trident VS. STB
Message-ID: <1991Jun15.022342.209@colorado.edu>
Date: 15 Jun 91 02:23:42 GMT
Sender: news@colorado.edu (The Daily Planet)
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Lines: 14
Originator: chuj@horton.Colorado.EDU
Nntp-Posting-Host: horton.colorado.edu

I just tried my new Trident SVGA 1MB card against my 1 year old STB
POWERGRAPH 1 MB card, the machine used is a 486-33,  application was
POWER METER (ver. ?).  The TRIDENT LOST, the most difference in the
test was the FILL which was 3 seconds apart.  PMUs, Trident was behind
by about 20 PMU from the STB.  I use the 640x480 16 color mode which was
the highest rez for the test.  I did this to decide where the card was
going to be placed, the Trident is now in my 286-16 and the STB will
remain in the 486-33.  I had also problems before with the TRIDENT
conflicting with the MICROSCIENCE 122meg RLL (customers machine).  If
you are deciding a STB or TRIDENT pick the STB card, never had any
problems with it.


						Jeff