Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!lll-winken!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!widener!netnews.upenn.edu!eniac.seas.upenn.edu!spielman
From: spielman@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Terence Spielman)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: MSDOS v5.0
Message-ID: <44476@netnews.upenn.edu>
Date: 12 Jun 91 01:30:21 GMT
References: <23375@shlump.lkg.dec.com> <1991Jun11.223417.30511@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
Sender: news@netnews.upenn.edu
Reply-To: spielman@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Terence Spielman)
Organization: University of Pennsylvania
Lines: 19
Nntp-Posting-Host: eniac.seas.upenn.edu

I bought DOS 5.0 today and after installing it I have a question.  I have
no idea if anyone can help me but...

Before installing DOS 5.0, my system ran noticeably faster than a Compaq
386/33 (according to Norton Utilities System Info).  Now it runs only
comparably, i.e. only marginally faster.  My computer has 64K cache and
I'm beginning to think that somehow DOS is ignoring it.  As I am not too
well versed in juggling extended memory etc, I am not sure how the
64K cache is configured, is it in high memory or what?  I'm obviously
confused, can somebody help?

Terence


--
Terence Spielman       ___   __    spielman@eniac.seas.upenn.edu
 o/ --KIYAP!! |      \/ \ \_/__]        ,',',',',',',','`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`
/|___	      |     \/ o   /''''......,'   "A good education can never hurt
 <,           |    \\/     \,,,,......,     an active imagination."---Says Me