Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!pacbell.com!ucsd!qualcom.qualcomm.com!capri.qualcomm.com!rdippold
From: rdippold@capri.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: MSDOS 5.0 compatible with 4DOS?
Message-ID: <1991Jun15.182247.18345@qualcomm.com>
Date: 15 Jun 91 18:22:47 GMT
References: <23446@shlump.lkg.dec.com> <31291@hydra.gatech.EDU> <1568@caslon.cs.arizona.edu>
Sender: news@qualcomm.com
Distribution: usa
Organization: Qualcomm, Inc., San Diego, CA
Lines: 19
Nntp-Posting-Host: capri.qualcomm.com

In article <1568@caslon.cs.arizona.edu> dwebster@cs.arizona.edu (Dave E. Webster, Jr.) writes:
>
>   Since:
>
>   - 4DOS is a command shell replacement replacement for command.com that 
>     is superior in size (when not at the command prompt), online help,
>     Un*x-style wildcard expansion, aliases, and in providing a complete 
>     and sane selection of commands (move, tee, inkey, pushd, popd, etc) ...
>
>   - QEMM-386 provides superior EMS/XMS/Loadhi and directly supports
>     Desqview for true multitasking ...
>
>   I have one question:  Why did you upgrade to DOS 5.0?  What do you gain
>   over DOS 3.3 (I refuse to consider DOS 4.x as an intermediate version ;-})?

Large volume support without funny partitioning.  And I don't like 4dos.

-- 
Standard disclaimer applies, you legalistic hacks.     |     Ron Dippold