Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!eru!kth.se!cyklop.nada.kth.se!news From: d88-jwa@byse.nada.kth.se (Jon W{tte) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer Subject: Re: TicksCount Message-ID: Date: 11 Jun 91 19:25:13 GMT References: <5721@hemuli.tik.vtt.fi> <1991Jun11.092513.14329@cs.uri.edu> Sender: news@nada.kth.se (Mr News) Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden Lines: 15 In-reply-to: reynhout@cs.uri.edu's message of 11 Jun 91 09:25:13 GMT > reynhout@cs.uri.edu (Andrew Reynhout) writes: >1/100 sec precision would be appropriate. Hmm. In europe, where the freq of the AC is 50Hz, does TickCount() have a 1/50sec resolution? The TickCount is always 60/sec. It is generated by the screen refresh on the old macs, and by an async clock task on other macs. It is not tied to the AC cycle. -- Jon W{tte h+@nada.kth.se - Speed !