Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!linac!unixhub!pfkeb
From: pfkeb@kaon.SLAC.Stanford.EDU (Paul Kunz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: NeXT on Campus -- How's NeXT really doing at your school?
Message-ID: <PFKEB.91Jun13212159@kaon.SLAC.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 14 Jun 91 04:21:59 GMT
References: <lh5H?zbu@cs.psu.edu> <1713@toaster.SFSU.EDU>
	<HARDY.91Jun13003230@golem.ps.uci.edu>
Sender: news@unixhub.SLAC.Stanford.EDU
Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Lines: 19
Nntp-Posting-Host: kaon.slac.stanford.edu
In-reply-to: hardy@golem.ps.uci.edu's message of 13 Jun 91 07:32:35 GMT

In article <HARDY.91Jun13003230@golem.ps.uci.edu> hardy@golem.ps.uci.edu (Meinhard E. Mayer (Hardy)) writes:

   < stuff deleted >
   The cube was purchased a yearor two ago,
   the other station under the influence of SLAC. 

SLAC as DoE funded laboratory does not ``influence'' university staff as your
sentence might imply.  I hope the SLAC lawyers didn't read your statement
they might be upset.  I'm sure you didn't mean the way the sentence
could be read, so I'm not flaming you, just want to make things clear.

   On the other hand, NextStep applications being developped at SLAC
has led to the sale of a dozen or two  NeXTs at universities and even
in Europe.  Curiously, I don't think this is the case of the one I know
about at Irvine.

   As long as I'm being so legal, I guess I must add that I don't
speak for SLAC, the DoE, or the Board of Trustees of
the Leland Stanford Junior University.