Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!pacbell.com!att!news.cs.indiana.edu!news.nd.edu!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!purdue!haven.umd.edu!ni.umd.edu!sayshell.umd.edu!louie
From: louie@sayshell.umd.edu (Louis A. Mamakos)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: USENIX Summer 1991 and the absence of NeXT
Message-ID: <1991Jun14.232148.25283@ni.umd.edu>
Date: 14 Jun 91 23:21:48 GMT
References: <1991Jun13.142906.28474@ni.umd.edu> <SIMMONS.91Jun13132534@rigel.neep.wisc.edu> <1991Jun14.194907.2960@kithrup.COM>
Sender: usenet@ni.umd.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Lines: 11

In article <1991Jun14.194907.2960@kithrup.COM> sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan) writes:
>Of course, you could have gotten a cheap '386 clone and run unix on that for
>about half the money.

But not a "real" (i.e., BSD) based UNIX.

Of course, some of us have strong feelings about flavors of UNIX and
what we prefer.  I respect other folks decisions to be wrong about their
choice of UNIXes :-)

louie