Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!mcsun!ukc!mucs!mccuts!zzassgl
From: zzassgl@uts.mcc.ac.uk (Geoff Lane)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.internals
Subject: Re: (Too) Much Ado About Nothing (Re: Shared libraries are not necessary)
Keywords: X11 silliness
Message-ID: <2883@mccuts.uts.mcc.ac.uk>
Date: 11 Jun 91 12:50:31 GMT
References: <315@titccy.cc.titech.ac.jp> <1991Jun10.061602.25336@kithrup.COM> <426@n4hgf.Mt-Park.GA.US>
Organization: Manchester Computing Centre, Manchester, England, M13 9PL
Lines: 19

In article <426@n4hgf.Mt-Park.GA.US> wht@n4hgf.Mt-Park.GA.US (Warren Tucker) writes:
>I propose the next marathon twisted-fest begin with a discussion
>of changing the traditional null string terminatopr to 255.  
>That should spark some really enriching discussion and delicious
>back biting about nothing. :-)


Arrrrrhhhhhhhhh......... NO NO NO.  What you REALLY should do is
prefix all strings with an expicit length.  Look at the
advantages - no more scanning down the bytes looking for the end - no
more having to rewrite all the string handling routines because your
particular project *must* have strings with embedded null bytes - no
more forgetting about that final invisible byte and overwriting something
vital.

By the way, is this a 5 minute argument or a 10 minute argument?
-- 
Geoff. Lane.                                  Janet: zzassgl@uk.ac.mcc.cms
UTS Sys Admin, Manchester Computing Centre, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL