Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!GENIUS.TAU.AC.IL!shani From: shani@GENIUS.TAU.AC.IL (Oren Shani) Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: Load Avarage graph pattern Message-ID: <2184@ccsg.tau.ac.il> Date: 11 Jun 91 06:37:09 GMT References: <2155@ccsg.tau.ac.il> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University Lines: 24 In article , meissner@osf.org (Michael Meissner) writes: |> Another thing could be the activity to run the various xclock |> programs, and such. I would imagine that on timesharing systems with |> lots of xterms, this could be significant. Yea, I think so too. Infact, this is why I started analayzing the LA garph - I intend to use the graph's "ruffness" as a meausre to the volume of activity in the computer, i.e. the number of little vi's and xterm's, etc, running arround. |> -- |> Michael Meissner email: meissner@osf.org phone: 617-621-8861 |> Open Software Foundation, 11 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA, 02142 |> |> You are in a twisty little passage of standards, all conflicting. --- Geez! someone still remeber ol' Zork! :-) -- __ __ Oren Shani (shani@genius.tau.ac.il) / / / Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv university / / -- Israel /__/ . __/ . "Hold your temper" -- The caterpillar to Alice