Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mstar!mstar.morningstar.com!bob
From: bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield)
Subject: Re: sun x-window terminals
In-Reply-To: tanm@seneca.bst.rochester.edu's message of 10 Jun 91 22:58:57 GMT
Message-ID: <BOB.91Jun11104604@remora.MorningStar.Com>
Sender: usenet@MorningStar.COM (USENET Administrator)
Reply-To: bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield)
Organization: Morning Star Technologies
References: <14423@ur-cc.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 91 14:46:29 GMT
Lines: 14

In article <14423@ur-cc.UUCP> tanm@seneca.bst.rochester.edu (Martin Tanner) writes:
   does SUN manufacture an X-window terminal?

Not any more.  Before it was discontinued, they called it a 3/50 :-)

Many folks find that a cheap, used 3/50 running something called
Xkernel makes a very serviceable X terminal.  See answer 67 on the FAQ
list for details.

   If so, how does it compare with the DEC X-window terminal (1200)?

I'm not familiar with any benchmark results, but it almost certainly
wins the price comparison.  Especially if you have some lying around
collecting dust.