Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!think.com!hsdndev!cfa203!thakur From: PZ2@psuvm.psu.edu (David L. Phillips) Newsgroups: rec.arts.cinema Subject: Re: the charter, thr group, the (lack of) traffic Message-ID: <1991Jun15.012720.17552@zerkalo.harvard.edu> Date: 13 Jun 91 14:36:55 GMT References: <1991Jun8.224034.8360@cfa.harvard.edu> <1991Jun9.064801.11064@zerkalo.harvard.edu> <1991Jun9.183042.11310@zerkalo.harvard.edu> <1991Jun12.073029.14628@zerkalo.harvard.edu> <1991Jun12.232412.15264@zerkalo.harvard.edu> Sender: thakur@cfa.harvard.edu (Manavendra K. Thakur) Reply-To: David L. Phillips Followup-To: rec.arts.cinema Organization: Penn State University Lines: 19 Approved: thakur@zerkalo.harvard.edu >> The two mailing lists are : SCREEN-L & FILM-L. >> >There is also CINEMA-L. (Can you provide Internet addresses for the sites of >the two you mentioned, please?) > >[Moderator's note: Would it be worthwhile and/or advisable to link up >rec.arts.cinema with one or more of these mailing lists? Do messages >sent to the mailing list(s) tend to run along the lines of messages >posted to rec.arts.movies (i.e. lots of trivia, endless repetitions of >frequently asked questions, etc etc)? Or are the messages moderated >by someone? Would someone familiar with these mailing lists care to >comment on what they're like? -- MKT] I'm familiar only with bit.listerv.cinema-l. It is not moderated. Messages tend to be a little more serious than rec.arts.movies but don't get into (usually) social issues related to cinema, production values and techniques, etc. If that is your objective, then you should plow ahead and hope that the serious cinema buffs/professionals will find your forum.