Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!ucbvax!cis.ohio-state.edu!sample.eng.ohio-state.edu!purdue!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!gatech.edu From: emory!Dixie.Com!jgd@gatech.edu (John G. DeArmond) Newsgroups: rec.guns Subject: Re: .30 cal carbine Message-ID: <35568@mimsy.umd.edu> Date: 13 Jun 91 13:53:44 GMT Article-I.D.: mimsy.35568 Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu Organization: Dixie Communications, The South's First Commercial Public Access Unix Lines: 32 Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu MEDELMA@cms.cc.wayne.edu (Michael Edelman) writes: #The M1 Carbine is very good at doing what it's supposed to do. It's not #a marksman's rifle, or a sniper's weapon, or anything like that. It #was conceived as an alternative to the sidearm for non-infantry troops. #The cartridge has ballistics similar to the .357- i.e., a hot handgun #round. Given the choice of reaching for my .357 or my carbine in a tight #situtation, I'd grab the carbine with a couple of 30 round magazines. #IMHO, of course. --mike I agree. The ballistics and thhe loading parameters are almost identical. In fact, for the standard military 30 cal ball (130 gr?), the maximum load of Winchester 231 (a good pistol powder) which consists of filling the case to the brim, wiping it off level and compressing the powder with a bullet, is within a few grains of a hot .357 load. Like Mike, given the choice between a .357 and my Enforcer (.30 cal carbine with the barrel bobbed at the end of the forestock and with a pistol grip) with a couple of 30 round mags, there is no doubt what I'd select. I'd never go to the National Matches with a .30 carbine but I'd sure use it for self-defence and close in work. And to beat all, it's a damn fun gun to shoot. Not near the muzzle blast and about the same recoil as .223. John -- John De Armond, WD4OQC | "Purveyors of speed to the Trade" (tm) Rapid Deployment System, Inc. | Home of the Nidgets (tm) Marietta, Ga | {emory,uunet}!rsiatl!jgd | "Vote early, Vote often"