Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news.arc.nasa.gov!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!uihepa.hep.uiuc.edu From: cbl@uihepa.hep.uiuc.edu (Chris Luchini) Newsgroups: rec.guns Subject: Re: Long gun for rural property Message-ID: <35693@mimsy.umd.edu> Date: 15 Jun 91 15:16:28 GMT Sender: magnum@mimsy.umd.edu Organization: High Energy Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Lines: 30 Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu In article <35677@mimsy.umd.edu>, dak@uihepa.hep.uiuc.edu (David Kardelis- I am the NRA) writes: #In article <35662@mimsy.umd.edu>, smosjc!joseph@uunet.uu.net writes: ##Ever shoot one? Out of the box it can be very humbling. I took my ##model 94 to the range put one round thru it and ... ouch! I tried another ##round. Ouch! # # I have to agree to this, I took my Browning B-92 in 44 mag #out to the range and after 5 shots I had to really convince myself #to fire another round. My shoulder was black and blue for 3-4 days. # Any recommendations on on recoil pads. I have only seen #Pachmayr's. I would like soething a little more squishy than the Pachmayr's. # dave Having fired Dave's b92, I can attest to the fact that it's 'interesting' to shoot it off the bench. I have no problem with the recoil from standing, so I must be doing something right. . . Anyway, since I'm getting closer and closer to actually taking the plunge and getting one of my p-14's built up into a 458 WinMag, I'd like to ask for recommendations for recoil pads for rifles that have that level of recoil. (actually, the 458 is just something to let me work up my recoil endurance, up to the level of the 500 A-square. People always ask me what the hell I want a 500 A-square for, as in "what the hell is it usefull for"? The only reply I have found that works is "it's a toy, just like your sports car: not real useful, but loads of fun!" :)) -cbl | Chris Luchini/1110 W. Green/Urbana IL 61801/217-333-0505 | | cbl@uihepa.hep.uiuc.edu (best) |Cluch@fnald.bitnet (second chance) | no cute sig found. . . thinking . . . thinking . . .