Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!news.cs.indiana.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ysub!psuvm!dearn!dbnmeb1!netadm
From: NETADM@DBNMEB1.BITNET (Peter Hakenberg)
Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts
Subject: Re: automated sequencing
Message-ID: <91169.084826NETADM@DBNMEB1.BITNET>
Date: 18 Jun 91 13:27:34 GMT
References: <9106140059.AA13341@genbank.bio.net> <1593@nih-csl.nih.gov>
Distribution: bionet
Organization: Universit{tsklinik Bonn, Germany
Lines: 12

In article <1593@nih-csl.nih.gov>, donnel@helix.nih.gov (Donald A. Lehn) says:
..
>I very seriously doubt whether it would save much time over traditional
>sequence methods.
It is only usefull if you need to sequence more often.

>n addition, while someone is editing a sequence on the
>instrument, it can not be used for sequencing at the same time.
>
You should use the multifinder on the mac and perhaps 1-2mb more RAM

bye pi (Peter Hakenberg)