Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!sunic!news.funet.fi!uwasa.fi!ts From: ts@uwasa.fi (Timo Salmi) Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d Subject: Re: ALED goes to the wastebasket here in Iceland Message-ID: <1991Jun17.085509.4678@uwasa.fi> Date: 17 Jun 91 08:55:09 GMT References: <3246@krafla.rhi.hi.is> <1991Jun14.210757.13150@uwasa.fi> <4090@sixhub.UUCP> Organization: University of Vaasa, Finland Lines: 30 In article <4090@sixhub.UUCP> davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (bill davidsen) writes: : > The pas/fail is done on the basis of whether a program is useful or >entertaining, not based on standards for human interface. If a program Agreed, and naturally condoned (for whatever it is worth). Just one detail to avoid (furher?) misunderstandings on this part of the subject. User interface is certainly not the _only_ aspect I use in my own moderating decisions at garbo. But it has an important bearing on these decisions. On the other hand there is no need to deny that fact that your and my selection criteria seem to differ at occasions. (But then, again, why shouldn't they). >seems useful to a number of readers, as the editor in question, the fact >that it won't handle special characters is regretable, but I don't feel >that I should deprive readers who find it useful of the chance to >evaluate and use it. I must blame myself for being unclear. Perhaps I should have changed the subject header when making my comment trying to draw our fellow programmers' attention to quality control aspect. I was meaning to speak in general. I wasn't making a comment on ALED one way or the other. (Well, be that as may, at least an interesting discussion has ensued around ALED). ................................................................... Prof. Timo Salmi Moderating at garbo.uwasa.fi anonymous ftp archives 128.214.12.37 School of Business Studies, University of Vaasa, SF-65101, Finland Internet: ts@chyde.uwasa.fi Funet: gado::salmi Bitnet: salmi@finfun