Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!nstar!larry
From: larry@nstar.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Telebit and V.32bis
Message-ID: <1991Jun16.133424.15765@nstar.rn.com>
Date: 16 Jun 91 13:34:24 GMT
References: <98879@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> <1991Jun6.193254.3886@robobar.co.uk> <1991Jun07.020706.16088@nstar.rn.com> <1991Jun7.193033.7604@robobar.co.uk> <1991Jun10.175931.11466@hq.demos.su>
Organization: NSTAR, Indiana's BBS 219-289-0287/317-251-7391
Lines: 16

avg@hq.demos.su (Vadim Antonov) writes:

>Hm. Our team has sufficient experience fighting against poor quality
>lines. PEP simply works. V.32 sucks. Cannot say much about V.32bis (never

well v.32bis holds a line much better than v.32 (at least the USR
v.32bis modems do - using their ASL).  We supply a backbone UUCP
feed of around 5 megs a day (compressed 16 bit traffic) using v.32bis
doing UUCP and that connection is quite noisy - but throughput runs
right at 1490 cps.  PEP on the same connection runs around 1250 cps.

-- 
      Larry Snyder, NSTAR Public Access Unix 219-289-0287/317-251-7391
                         HST/PEP/V.32/v.32bis/v.42bis 
                        regional UUCP mapping coordinator 
               {larry@nstar.rn.com, ..!uunet!nstar.rn.com!larry}