Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!pitt!willett!ForthNet
From: ForthNet@willett.pgh.pa.us (ForthNet articles from GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Multi-tasking and Multi-user
Message-ID: <2886.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 16 Jun 91 13:07:44 GMT
Organization: (n.) to be organized.  But that's not important right now.
Lines: 28


 Date: 06-13-91 (22:42)              Number: 150 of 162
   To: JACK WOEHR                    Refer#: 137
 From: ELLIOTT CHAPIN                  Read: NO
 Subj: MULTI-TASKING AND MULTI-U     Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE
 Conf: FORTH (58)                 Read Type: GENERAL (+)

 -> JAX, I just saw your Dr. Dobbs article.  What about queuing instead
 -> of roundrobin in the context of something like your "medium-
 -> heavyweight" multitasker?

 JW>        That's an interesting idea ... do you have an example in mind?
 Nothing specific; but I suppose it came to me in part because of
 Brad Rodriguez' article "Multiprocessor Forth Kernel" in
 Forth Dimensions vol. XI, #3.

 Elliott Chapin
 ---
  ~ DeLuxe} 1.12 #4315 ~

 PCRelay:CRS -> #460 RelayNet (tm)
 4.10           Canada Remote Systems * Toronto, Ontario
 <<<>>>
-----
This message came from GEnie via willett.  You *cannot* reply to the author
using e-mail.  Please post a follow-up article, or use any instructions
the author may have included (USMail addresses, telephone #, etc.).
Report problems to: dwp@willett.pgh.pa.us _or_ uunet!willett!dwp