Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!dali.cs.montana.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!pdn!tscs!tct!chip
From: chip@tct.com (Chip Salzenberg)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: Is UUNET going to upgrade?
Message-ID: <28609F47.1E0D@tct.com>
Date: 20 Jun 91 12:27:51 GMT
References: <1991Jun10.144434.21216@m2xenix.psg.com> <1991Jun18.024342.1387@uunet.uu.net> <1084@camco.Celestial.COM>
Organization: Teltronics/TCT, Sarasota, FL
Lines: 14

According to bill@camco.Celestial.COM (Bill Campbell):
>I would think it would be easier to implement some kind of mail
>batching capabilities rather than rewriting uucp for multiple
>machines.

Quite!  Batch SMTP already exists and is supported by Smail 3.1 (among
other transports).  What say you, UUNET?  BSMTP could cut down
significantly on E-Mail processing overhead, and lots of us out here
in modemland are already using it.
-- 
Chip Salzenberg at Teltronics/TCT     <chip@tct.com>, <uunet!pdn!tct!chip>
 "You can call Usenet a democracy if you want to.  You can call it a
  totalitarian dictatorship run by space aliens and the ghost of Elvis.
  It doesn't matter either way."  -- Dave Mack