Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!umich!ox.com!heifetz!tbomb!time From: time@ice.com (Tim Endres) Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp Subject: Re: Ithaca POP for PSI needs PEP : -) Message-ID: <1CE00001.insarr@tbomb.ice.com> Date: 21 Jun 91 02:01:05 GMT Reply-To: time@ice.com Organization: ICE Engineering, Inc. Lines: 16 X-Mailer: uAccess - Mac Release: 1.5 In article , peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) writes: > It's got nothing to do with bullying. There are many reasons for people > to be using the PEP protocol. That may be all they have, for example. Or > they may be calling from an exchange with older equipment (particularly > common in non-Bell areas) or through a PBX so PEP does provide better > performance on their lines. Some of our customers have reported that PEP works **far** better than V.32 for overseas connections. ------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Endres | time@ice.com ICE Engineering | uupsi!ice.com!time 8840 Main Street | Voice FAX Whitmore Lake MI. 48189 | (313) 449 8288 (313) 449 9208