Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!proto!doug
From: doug@proto.com (Doug Huffman)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject: Re: Intel 386 C
Message-ID: <1991Jun19.205942.23229@proto.com>
Date: 19 Jun 91 20:59:42 GMT
References: <1658@balrog.ctron.com> <1991Jun14.213319.16622@amc.com> <1991Jun17.000940.14512@proto.com> <1991Jun19.011524.13652@qualcomm.com>
Organization: Prototronics @ Sandpoint, Idaho
Lines: 14

antonio@qualcom.qualcomm.com (Franklin Antonio) writes:

>In article <1991Jun17.000940.14512@proto.com> doug@proto.com (Doug Huffman) writes:
>>I believe Zortech will be the first to ship a DOS extender that is DOS, VCPI,
>>and DMPI compliant (correct me if I'm wrong).

>You are wrong.  I recently bought a copy of the Phar Lap 286 DOS Extender,
>and it is DOS, VCPI, DPMI complient.  

I meant (but neglected) to say a 386 DOS extender that is DOS, VCPI, and 
DMPI compliant.  With that qualification how do I stand?
-- 
uunet!proto!doug
doug@proto.com