Xref: utzoo comp.windows.ms:13865 comp.os.os2.misc:1813 comp.windows.ms.programmer:3147
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sample.eng.ohio-state.edu!purdue!haven.umd.edu!socrates.umd.edu!uc780.umd.edu!coates
From: coates@uc780.umd.edu
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.windows.ms.programmer
Subject: RE: WFW memory woes
Message-ID: <17JUN91.22020578@uc780.umd.edu>
Date: 17 Jun 91 22:02:05 GMT
References: <1991Jun17.082712.48126@cc.usu.edu> <72798@microsoft.UUCP> <6669@gssc.UUCP> <1991Jun13.161907.25853@vuse.vanderbilt.edu> <1991Jun15.035442.2411@qualcomm.com> <1991Jun17.211358.184@trc.amoco.com>
Sender: news@socrates.umd.edu (News)
Organization: The University of Maryland University College
Lines: 17

zrra07@rental8.trc.amoco.com (Randall R. Appleton) asks:
        What is the latest word between OS/2 and Windows. Will (or should)
OS/2 be able to run Windows programs[?].

        Articles in PC Week and elsewhere state that it is IBM's intention to
        have the next release of OS/2 be able to run DOS, Windows and OS/2
        applications. It is supposed to be released late '91 or early '92.
        This should put Window's apps on more solid footing from an
        operating system respective. Even more it means it still makes
        sense to get up and/or keep up to speed programming Windows.
        Happy Computing!

**************************************************************************
*                     Elliott Coates, washington dc                      *
*                         coates@uc780.umd.edu                           *
*                             coates@uc780.bitnet                        *
**************************************************************************