Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!mcrware!jejones
From: jejones@mcrware.UUCP (James Jones)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os9
Subject: Re: inconsistent *** illegal type combination *** error
Message-ID: <6970@mcrware.UUCP>
Date: 19 Jun 91 11:17:58 GMT
References: <1991Jun18.123455.12845@mmm.serc.3m.com>
Reply-To: jejones@mcrware.UUCP (James Jones)
Organization: Microware Systems Corp., Des Moines, Iowa
Lines: 11

In article <1991Jun18.123455.12845@mmm.serc.3m.com> manning@halley.tmc.edu (Arthur T. Manning) writes:
>cc68 doesn't behave consistently with types.  It will complain about
>it in certain cases, but not in others due to nothing other than
>THE ORDER OF OPERANDS.  cc68 is not comutative with == .
>try this code:

I did, and got no error message.  Information on edition numbers is useful when
reporting problems.  (For cross tools, I believe one can do something like
"strings c68 | grep sysedit".)

	James Jones