Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!lll-winken!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!wlbr!pete
From: pete@wlbr.imsd.contel.com (Pete Lyall)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os9
Subject: Re: Can't execute "J" - Error #000: 216
Message-ID: <1991Jun20.183327.10017@wlbr.imsd.contel.com>
Date: 20 Jun 91 18:33:27 GMT
References: <1991Jun18.235439.6486@ncsu.edu> <1991Jun19.063541.16459@wlbr.imsd.contel.com> <220@blars>
Organization: Contel Federal Systems
Lines: 12

Exiting with a '1' status is probably easier. I was thinking that the
shell can be told to ignore an errant process and continue (-x in 6809
land), but in this one case, the 'procedure' shell was invoked
accidentally, and wouldn't have been told to ignore errors.

Pete

-- 
Pete Lyall [GTE]   Compuserve: 76703,4230   Internet: pete@wlbr.imsd.contel.com
                UUCP: {hacgate,jplgodo,voder}!wlbr!pete 
"... So I picked up my pride from beneath the pay phone, and combed his breath 
right outta my hair. And sometimes, it's not so easy ..." J. Hendrix/My Friend