Xref: utzoo comp.periphs:3838 comp.unix.admin:2241
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!o.gp.cs.cmu.edu!netnews
From: cbs@cs.cmu.edu (Clauss Strauch)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs,comp.unix.admin
Subject: DAT and 8mm:  practical experiences
Message-ID: <1991Jun17.024733.3999@cs.cmu.edu>
Date: 17 Jun 91 02:47:33 GMT
Sender: netnews@cs.cmu.edu (USENET News Group Software)
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
Lines: 21


	I've seen the hype and some of the technical data comparing 8mm to 
4mm tape drives, but would like to hear people's practical experiences with 
the two media.  Specifically:  
		-- Experiences with reliablity, both for the drives and
	           the media (how well do the tapes hold up to repeated
                   use/abuse?).

		-- The 90m (2 GB w/o compression) DAT drives are available,
                   but are the drives and media as reliable as the lower-
		   capacity ones?  It seems like just a short while ago
		   the 90m tapes were bleeding edge.
		   
		-- Anything else that gets left out of the advertising
		   blurbs and technical specifications, but might cause a 
		   sysadmin to prefer one technology over the other.

                                       -- Clauss Strauch
                                          Engineering Design Research Center
                                          Carnegie Mellon University
                                          cbs@edrc.cmu.edu