Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!otter.hpl.hp.com!hpltoad!hpopd!hpcpbla!kev From: kev@hpcpbla.HP.COM (Kevin Jones) Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi Subject: Re: Random Access DAT Message-ID: <9850030@hpcpbla.HP.COM> Date: 18 Jun 91 08:18:41 GMT References: <1991Jun14.211246.4340@newshost.anu.edu.au> Organization: HP Computer Peripherals Bristol, UK Lines: 78 All conclusions drawn in your response to my posting are correct. Some specific points: > that you are unaware of any software that uses the > DDS facilities available, (ie. w.r.t fast search etc....) On PC's, applications like SYTOS allow selective store/recovery. On workstations, I am not aware of any good backup (lets say "data archiving") applications (that's not saying none exist). > with a "stacker" you cannot randomly select the next cassette Correct. > Can you please provide any details you have available on who > is marketing "stackers" and at what price? I'm not sure about what stackers are currently on the market. I've seen lots of "demo" type stuff that "looses" the occasional cassette. Many stackers have SCSI and/or other "computer" interfaces and claim to be able to do random access. Unless you've got a device driver for such a machine then you still have no random access ability, ie. you've got a stacker that might be a juke box if someone wrote a driver for it. > I don't understand this answer. My understanding was that the audio DAT > format is fully digital and the DDS format is just a particular form of Correct. > it that defines block numbers etc. If so, why should only the mechanism DDS is "built on top" of the audio format. It defines a further level of blocking (23 audio "frames" form a single 126Kbyte DDS "group"). A DDS "group" contains blocks of user data (multiple blocks can be packed into a group, a block can span one or more groups, no space is wasted irrespective of block size) and a "block access table" that is, in effect, an INDEX for locations of blocks in the group and their sizes. The "block access table" also contains information on the prescence and quantity of filemarks/setmarks. The drives embedded software is responsible for the creation of block access tables on writes, and their use in "unpacking" groups on reads. > be the same and not also the digital electronics (including read/write > amplifiers)? If there is a digital signal being recorded and played > back, why should accessing that for audio be any more difficult than >recording an audio CD (digitally) on a DAT? I can understand there > might be extra stuff for fast searches etc but surely more than the > mechanism is the same. A lot of the DAT digital electronics can be "re used" in a computer product. Specifically, circuitry to do the 1st and 2nd levels of error correction, and servo circuitry. There are many functions not performed in audio dat though: Read After Write, Buffering of Data (typically 0.5 Mbytes), 3rd level error correction, SCSI (not an insignificant part!!!), DDS format (built on top of DAT audio format), extensive quantities of performance/data-integrity oriented embedded software. These functions contribute more to the cost of a product than the "audio" functions (including the mechanism). ----------------------------------------------------------------- Kevin Jones. | Hewlett Packard Ltd, | Computer Peripherals Bristol, kev%hpcpbla@hplb.hpl.hp.com | Filton Road, | Stoke Gifford, Tel: 011 44 272 799910 (ext 22351) | Bristol. BS12 6QZ. | ENGLAND. ----------------------------------------------------------------- This response does not represent the official position of, or statement by, the Hewlett-Packard Company. The above data is provided for informational purposes only. It is supplied without warranty of any kind.