Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!mips!pacbell.com!ucsd!mvb.saic.com!unogate!unocal!genisco!arcturus!felix!darnold@felix.UUCP
From: darnold@felix.UUCP (Dave Arnold)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Is there such a thing as a uucp daemon?
Message-ID: <165451@felix.UUCP>
Date: 19 Jun 91 17:06:35 GMT
References: <1991Jun6.185715.16350@versyss.uucp> <139@gordius.gordian.com> <8295@auspex.auspex.com> <9106120113.AA16777@toaster.SFSU.EDU>
Sender: daemon@felix.UUCP
Reply-To: darnold@felix.UUCP (Dave Arnold)
Organization: FileNet Corp., Costa Mesa, CA
Lines: 8

In article <9106120113.AA16777@toaster.SFSU.EDU> eps@cs.SFSU.EDU writes:
>Will it interoperate with BSD uucpd?  Not out of the box.  For
>one, AT&T's code uses 'e' protocol rather than 't' protocol over
>TCP connections.
>
>					-=EPS=-

But, what's to stop me from running 'g' over TCP connections?