Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!rex!ukma!aunro!alberta!brazeau.ucs.ualberta.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!ubc-cs!uw-beaver!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tektronix!percy!m2xenix!quagga!undeed!barrett
From: barrett@Daisy.EE.UND.AC.ZA (Alan P Barrett)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
Subject: Re: decimals in the serial field
Message-ID: <1991Jun20.093116.19537@Daisy.EE.UND.AC.ZA>
Date: 20 Jun 91 09:31:16 GMT
References: <JBRYANS.91Jun17110704@beach.csulb.edu> <6529@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> <kre.677213961@mundamutti.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
Organization: Univ. Natal, Durban, S. Africa
Lines: 23

In article <kre.677213961@mundamutti.cs.mu.OZ.AU>,
kre@cs.mu.oz.au (Robert Elz) writes:
  jnford@argos.weeg.uiowa.edu (Jay Ford) writes:
  
  >Or, a serial number format of yyyymmddnn (with a 4-digit year) could be used.
  
  That's exactly what we use here already - ie: the serial number of AU is
  
  	1991061500
  
  I've been using that format for ages - but now I've come to believe that
  the 2 digit 'nn' is unnecessary, one digit would be enough - more than
  10 changes in a day just doesn't happen often enough to matter (and if
  it ocasionally does you can just borrow a number from tomorrow).  I don't
  think I've ever actually gotten past about 05 ...
  
  That also solves all problems with possible signed numbers, etc, for a
  very long time indeed.
  
  Unfortunately switching from the 'nn' format back to a single 'n'
  isn't trivial, or I'd do that.
  
  kre