Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!csus.edu!csusac!cindy!madams
From: madams@ecst.csuchico.edu (Michael E. Adams)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Re: TELNET daemon for MS-DOS anyone?
Message-ID: <1991Jun20.074626.20949@ecst.csuchico.edu>
Date: 20 Jun 91 07:46:26 GMT
References: <9106191238.AA20987@ftp.com> <xn+l46q@rpi.edu> <1991Jun19.204430.48165@cc.usu.edu>
Sender: news@ecst.csuchico.edu (no news is good news)
Organization: California State University, Chico
Lines: 25
Nntp-Posting-Host: cscihp.ecst.csuchico.edu

In article <1991Jun19.204430.48165@cc.usu.edu> 
jrd@cc.usu.edu (Joe R. Doupnik) writes:
>To remove all opinion I suggest a simple test.

>Plug a terminal (remember those things?) in to the serial port of a PC and
>tell DOS   CTTY COM1. That's as good as Telnet is every going to be, usually
>Telnet is only 7-bits wide. Ok, now run some nice application and see how
>far that terminal can go (an inch or two). Why? Because the DOS application
>is not written to run via stdin/stdout, no way, but that's all one gets with
>Telnet. 
>	Joe D.


I thought this was worth reposting.  Still, I wonder how long the "net"
will remember what was learned here today?  

Thanks Joe for typing out the words ONE MORE TIME  ;-)

         (___)      |  Michael E. Adams
         (o o)      |  Custom Computer Programming
  /-------\ /       |  P.O. Box 5027
 / |     ||O        |  Chico,  California  95927-5025    U.S.A.
*  ||,---||         |
   ~~    ~~         |  Internet: madams@cscihp.ecst.csuchico.edu
No BULL bandwidth   |