Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixb.cc.columbia.edu!es1 From: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita) Subject: Re: (Video) Hardware Idiots ? Message-ID: <1991Jun16.151930.1712@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Sender: usenet@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Network News) Nntp-Posting-Host: cunixb.cc.columbia.edu Reply-To: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita) Organization: Columbia University References: <1131@stewart.UUCP> <1991Jun15.032812.15122@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> Date: Sun, 16 Jun 1991 15:19:30 GMT In article rkushner@sycom.UUCP (Ronald Kushner) writes: > >Lets say it costs $27 million to engineer the custom chips from a clean sheet >design. With only 12,000 Amiga 3000's sold, it would cost $2166 per unit just >to pay off the engineering, not including added production costs of making >different parts. Lets say only 300 people go for this option? Commodore has >lost $20++ million dollars on this pet project. Sure it makes the Amiga look >better in a few eyes, it will add a feature no one will support in their >software because it wasn't done across the line. Any improvement to the custom >chips, other than 32 bit wide bus, will have to be done across the line to pay >for itself, and for people to support it. And it probably will break the >Toaster again, and then we see a bizillion messages on the net about how >Commodore screwed up again... > Where do you get the 12,000 A3000 sales figure? Any place official, rumor, or guesswork? -- Ethan Now the world has gone to bed, Now I lay me down to sleep, Darkness won't engulf my head, Try to count electric sheep, I can see by infrared, Sweet dream wishes you can keep, How I hate the night. How I hate the night. -- Marvin