Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga.programmer:4580 comp.sys.amiga.misc:4632
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zazen!schaefer.math.wisc.edu!mueller
From: mueller@schaefer.math.wisc.edu (Carl Mueller)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer,comp.sys.amiga.misc
Subject: Re: New Eiffel-like OOP language
Message-ID: <1991Jun16.145750.14475@schaefer.math.wisc.edu>
Date: 16 Jun 91 14:57:50 GMT
References: <1991Jun16.063222.1304@csis.dit.csiro.au>
Reply-To: mueller@schaefer.UUCP (Carl Mueller)
Organization: Univ. of Wisconsin Dept. of Mathematics
Lines: 18

In article <1991Jun16.063222.1304@csis.dit.csiro.au> dave@csis.dit.csiro.au (David Campbell) writes:
>G'day!
>
>I think we can give up hope of compiling anything serious with Lattice C,
>
Wait a second ... why do you say this?  I have Lattice C (SAS/C) version 5.10
and haven't had any troubles compiling stuff.  However, I am not really a 
programmer ... I'm working on my PhD in mathematics, so I'm not really in any
position to judge a compiler.  I would like to know what the limitations are
that you see in SAS/C (Lattice C) for the AMIGA (if for no other reason than
to know what I can expect my compiler to do [or not do]).

Thanks.

>-- Dave Campbell
>-- dave@csis.dit.csiro.au

Carl Mueller (mueller@math.wisc.edu)