Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga.advocacy:4048 comp.sys.amiga.programmer:4649 comp.sys.amiga.misc:4693 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!jhunix!barrett From: barrett@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU (Dan Barrett) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.programmer,comp.sys.amiga.misc Subject: Re: Another Amiga reorganization needed? Message-ID: <8737@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU> Date: 18 Jun 91 12:56:52 GMT References: <1991Jun16.014324.532@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <1991Jun18.092655.12436@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Organization: The Johns Hopkins University - HCF Lines: 29 In article <1991Jun18.092655.12436@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> xanthian@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Kent Paul Dolan) writes: >and 80% of comp.sys.amiga.programmer is still too damn big. Personally, I find the number of postings to be just fine. How big is "too big"? 3 posts a day? 30? 300? If you must break up .programmer, how about: c.s.a.programmer.novice For beginner questions c.s.a.programmer.wizards For really in depth stuff c.s.a.programmer.misc For everything else >any volunteers to moderate c.s.a.futures if we make one? I didn't like this name back before the reorganization, and I still don't like it. What's it mean? "Futures" makes me think of "pork futures" or some such money-related stuff. If people want to talk about Commodore's future, how about comp.sys.amiga.speculation, or even comp.sys.amiga.thefuture? c.s.a.hardware.problems does sound really good, though. Dan //////////////////////////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ | Dan Barrett, Department of Computer Science Johns Hopkins University | | INTERNET: barrett@cs.jhu.edu | | | COMPUSERVE: >internet:barrett@cs.jhu.edu | UUCP: barrett@jhunix.UUCP | \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/////////////////////////////////////