Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!svin02!eba!ebh.eb.ele.tue.nl!wjw
From: wjw@ebh.eb.ele.tue.nl (Willem Jan Withagen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo
Subject: re: Open Letter Response
Message-ID: <1218@eba.eb.ele.tue.nl>
Date: 18 Jun 91 13:17:34 GMT
References: <9106172251.AA05357@pan.ssec.honeywell.com>
Sender: news@eb.ele.tue.nl (The News system)
Reply-To: wjw@eb.ele.tue.nl
Organization: Digital Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands
Lines: 30

In article <9106172251.AA05357@pan.ssec.honeywell.com>, thompson@PAN.SSEC.HONEYWELL.COM (John Thompson) writes:
=> 
=> Well, HP/Apollo responded (if you can call it that).  Since it appears that
=> they did not send to the comp.sys.apollo mailing list, I am assuming that
=> come after it.
=> 
=> >   TO:    Hewlett-Packard Domain Customers
=> >   FROM:  Hewlett-Packard Company
=> >   SUBJ:  Response to May 20, 1991 Open Letter
=> >   DATE:  June 14, 1991

I'm not going to be suprissed by all this any longer. Last week I received
documentation for snakes, and they have the same tone:
	Apollo users should not complain, they are getting HP-stuff.
	It's horibly cheap and fast. It's not what you want but who cares

Well, as far as I'm concerned: It sucks!

As far as I know is our group a member of ADUS, but I can't remember
seeing ever any Newsletter. (excuses are due if this turns out to be false )
And even if we are, it is more than impolite to ignore most of the
people supporting the Open Letter.

	Willem Jan

-- 
Eindhoven University of Technology   DomainName:  wjw@eb.ele.tue.nl    
Digital Systems Group, Room EH 10.10 
P.O. 513                             Tel: +31-40-473401
5600 MB Eindhoven                    The Netherlands